College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

President Obama plans reform of student loan system

Published: Monday, April 27, 2009

Updated: Monday, April 27, 2009 05:04

Last Friday, President Barack Obama announced his plans to make higher education more affordable by reforming the country’s student loan system, decreasing the role of private lenders and placing the responsibility on the federal government.

“In the end, this is not about growing the size of the government or relying on the free market — because it’s not a free market when we have a student loan system that’s rigged to reward private lenders without any risk,” Obama said. “It’s about whether we want to give tens of billions of tax dollars to special interests or whether we want to make college more affordable for eight-and-a-half million more students.”

To make college more affordable for students, Obama said he is calling for a shift from the private Federal Family Education Loans to federal Direct Loans. While the FFEL program currently accounts for the majority of college loans, Obama said the country cannot afford the billions of dollars in premiums that banks receive from taxpayers each year.

“Under the FFEL program, lenders get a big government subsidy with every loan they make,” Obama said. “And these loans are then guaranteed with taxpayer money, which means that if a student defaults, a lender can get back almost all of its money from our government.”

According to Obama, an end to the FFEL program and a transition to Direct Loans would make tax dollars directly responsible for helping students pay for college and ultimately “save tens of billions of tax dollars over the next 10 years.”

During a conference call with media outlets on Friday, Secretary of Education Arne Duncan said he recognizes the controversy surrounding what business the American government is involved in by taking over the loan system.

“I fundamentally think we should not be in the business of propping up banks and investing in banks,” Duncan said. “I would much rather invest in our young people and our country’s young people and help literally millions and millions of additional students have access to tens of billions of dollars in subsidized banks.”

The Obama administration has already taken several steps over the past few months, including the creation of a $2,500 annual tax credit to help cover the cost of tuition, which Obama said millions of working families are now eligible to receive.

“At a time when our children are competing with kids in China and India, the best job qualification you can have is a college degree or advanced training,” Obama said. “And yet, in a paradox of American life, at the very moment it’s never been more important to have a quality higher education, the cost of that kind of education has never been higher.”

Duncan said the federal government will invest tens of billions of dollars over the next 10 years to ensure that a college education is affordable for those students who “have worked hard and really want to go to college.”

Among the other steps being taken, Obama said he is reforming the Pell Grants “that roughly 30 percent of students rely on to put themselves through college.”

Obama said he plans to add $500 to Pell Grants for the 2009-10 academic year and raise the maximum Pell Grant from $5,350 to $5,500 next year.

In addition to increasing the maximum amounts, Obama is also planning to give Pell Grants a fixed rate above inflation to ensure that grants increase as costs continue to rise for American families.

“And this will help prevent a projected shortfall in Pell Grant funding in a few years that could rob many of our poorest students of their dream of attending college,” Obama said. “It will help ensure that Pell Grants are a source of funding that students can count on each and every year.”

Obama said by transitioning from the FFEL program to the Direct Loans, the money saved would pay for 95 percent of his plan to guarantee Pell Grant growth.

In addition to the billions of dollars to be spent on making higher education more affordable, Duncan said the federal government will be investing $2.5 billion over the next five years in an attempt to increase retention rates.

“Obviously getting students into college and the front door is very important, but if they’re not coming out the back end with a diploma, we’re really not changing any long term prospects that much,” Duncan said.

Some university community members are concerned that as the focus and demand for retention rates increases, there is the potential result for a decreased quality of education due to such factors as professors inflating grades in order to meet retention rate goals. Duncan said while this concern is legitimate, his experiences have proven the opposite result occurs.

“When you raise the bar, when you raise the expectation, people rise to meet that bar,” Duncan said. “I think people work really hard, and I think the way you increase attainment is not by grade inflation, it’s by creating a culture and climate where students that might be at risk of dropping out get that support and have those mentors, those counselors, those folks working with them.”

While Obama said the federal government has the responsibility to make college more affordable, institutions of higher education must also control “spiraling costs” of tuition — a responsibility that will require “hard choices” on budget matters.

“So I challenge state, college and university leaders to put affordability front and center as they chart a path forward,” Obama said.

To cut the cost of implementing his education proposals, Obama said the government is “going to eliminate waste, reduce inefficiency and cut what we don’t need to pay for what we do.”

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

17 comments

ANNE
Fri Jul 31 2009 10:13
HeLp!!! These private student loans are racking up loads of profits thru their outragous interest rates that keep going higher & higher. I lived in proverty all my life, but these types of loans are rediculous. How could they loan
someone these monies without collarteral and keep loaning, there's no limit to what they will loan you---on your signature alone. MAN!! I am crying out for some type of fix/handout because who makes that kind of money to pay these loan payments---they are C-R-A-Z-Y these lenders----OBAMA -Congressman !!! someone give us some releif from thes loan sharks and scammers----I was just too easy for them to give us the money now it's just toooo hard to have the money to pay back let alone 3-4 more than we received.............. They are playing with people's lives---What about all those millionaires who have so much money they can't even spend --- why don't they HELP out instead of being so selfish and UNGODLY ---It makes no sense to me, they are no better than the next guy, it may even make them happier people to make someone's life better so as to not have to worry about paying these outlandish amounts to the rich who have enough money anyway. IT"S DRIVING ME NUTS-----equality is a word of evilness in this world --how deceiving of a place---I can't wait til JESUS CHRIST RETURNS ---We will see what it means to say "The power of the good will overcome evil". May God Bless us All and may we know his goodness before it's too late!!!!???????
Jim
Tue Jul 7 2009 09:29
What I enjoy are people like Dan who are passionately "no government handouts", "Student loans are a waste of money". So as a result, more people don't go to college, more people stay in poverty and at low standards of living, more people are added to welfare, unemployment and food stamp roles, more people use medicaid because they don't have jobs or not jobs that offer them insurance and the end result is that the one-time use of 30,000 in loans that the government would get back, becomes hundreds of thousands of dollars in handouts that the government gets no ROI on. Love the right-wingers, always thinking long-term.
Your name
Tue Jul 7 2009 00:10
Dan,

FYI, none. Athletic Dept. money all comes from the student general fee, including Beckman's salary, which is about $300,000K. The student general fee is currently about 275 bucks per semester. Athletics also gets money from their ticket sales. I realize the point of your post was a rhetorical question meant to cast blame without facts, so my apologies if my facts get in the way of that.

dan
Mon Jul 6 2009 14:11
The Collages claim that the cost of operating a collage has increases and that is why it cost so much. I wonder how much of the cost goes towards pay a million dollar salary to a football coach.
AD
Thu Jun 18 2009 14:41
Full Monty, I agree. I wouldn't want the government to do anything either. Lets privatize the military too. Mercenaries are badass, right?
blizzle
Wed Jun 17 2009 00:00
I get the idea of getting more people more money, but what about making colleges reduce their cost? The cost can't simply raise forever.
esther sendeza
Mon Jun 15 2009 03:48
i love obama !!!!!
Full Monty Hall
Tue May 19 2009 21:52
I long for the day that the government takes over student loans and drives lenders out. I feel all warm inside knowing the government, not private profiteers, will handle them.

Same warm feelings I had during Hurricane Katrina. And when I drive to FedEx to mail a package.

Kathy
Mon May 18 2009 14:48
I have a niece that went to a culinary school - Sallie Mae was there to "help". Then she graduated, now her loan has more than doubled & with the economy she can't even get a job in her profession. They're now demanding payment of $700 per month - working two jobs, living at home woth her mom again & she can't make enough to live on let alone pay that kind of loan! Everyone that thought they were bettering themselves need the help now - not after the future loans.
Dan Lyle
Fri May 8 2009 14:34
"Liberal Fascism" isn't a contradiction of terms unless you adhere to the myth that the far left and far right are starkly different. F.A. Hayek showed just how close they are. There is a reason why Hitler's National Socialists hated the communists -- they both believed in many of the same things -- i.e. central planning and rule by sheer power and authority rather than rule by law and blind justice. As the pigs say in "Animal Farm" by George Orwell (I haven't read this book yet myself): "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others". When free markets and rule of law is replaced by socialism and central planning, you get a situation where there is a ruling elite and the impoverished masses underneath them. Such was the situation in former East Germany and people I've met there -- some shmoozed their way into getting special priviledges with the communist party and got special benefits because of their ability to woo those in power.

The term "Liberal Fascism" is a title of a book by Jonah Goldberg. I've read it and found it very informative. Although it definitely has the edge of say an Ann Coulter book. It definitely leaves one more hateful of the wrong ideas of the liberals or progressives, but doesn't necessarily illustrate positive principles of freedom like Milton Friedman's book "Free to Choose" does.

Goldberg defines Fascism as follows:

"Fascism is a religion of the state. It assumes the organic unity of the body politic and longs for a national leader attuned to the will of the people. It is totalitarian in that it views everything as political and holds that any action by the state is justified to achieve the common good. It takes responsibility for all aspects of life, including our health and well-being, and seeks to impose uniformity of thought and action, whether by force or through regulation and social pressure. Everything, including the economy and religion, must be aligned with its objectives. Any rival identity is part of the "problem" and therefore defined as an enemy. I will argue that contemporary American liberalism embodies all of these aspects of fascism."

As to why capitalism only truly worked in America, Britain and a few other countries like Hong Kong, the answer is provided in an excellent book entitled "The Mystery of Capital" by Hernando De Soto. De Soto talks about how in many countries that have tried capitalism and the free market system but have failed to prosper have failed because their laws and governments are still too oppressive and/or their property rights never evolved to allow capital to be used as both kinetic and potential energy in the economic engine. When land property for instance becomes terribly difficult to legally own and exchange, then it can only serve half its true potential -- i.e. you can only harness its tangible benefits and can't harness its intangible worth. Much of America's business success has been based on the notion that an entrepreneur can use his mortgage as collateral, i.e. as capital in starting his business. If you get a situation where no one can lose their homes anymore because the government doesn't want anyone to fail, then the mortgage loses its real value. You return to a medieval like situation where people are serfs rather than property owners. Those who already own land are sort of frozen into a new class system. Thus the destruction of private property and capitalism leads to much more of the class system that Karl Marx supposedly preached against in his flawed economic theories. Socialism inevitably leads to a situation where fewer people can succeed, and more are equally impoverished except the new politically correct elite that use political power to rob others of their wealth. If you don't believe me, then look at history. Or pick up an Ayn Rand novel. She experienced the full maturation of socialism into communism in the former Soviet Union.

John A. Merican
Wed May 6 2009 15:11
Oh I just love these government freebies! So much fun spending other peoples' money!
Your name
Wed May 6 2009 13:40
Dan... liberal fascist doesn't make any sense. That's like being a leftwing-rightwing extremist all at the same time. Political insults are important - they tell people right away that they don't need to read the rest of your opinion, which is thoughtful of you. But still, I'd go for consistency along with your thoughtfulness.
Dan Lyle
Wed May 6 2009 13:26
When a patient is sick a doctor looks at the symptoms and diagnoses a disease or deficiency. The prognosis will always be myopic however if all involved focus too much on the symptom and not on the disease itself. The symptoms mentioned here are "excessive student debt", "loan sharks", etc... However the underlying disease is the same that ails the housing markets -- people and institutions not wanting to take responsibility. The underlying disease is really the exhorbitant rise in tuition costs due to government intervention. These will only increase if you give the government yet more of a monopoly on education. Or if the government plays the game of controlling prices the taxpayer will shoulder a heavier burden. The government can try to prevent prices from trying to tell us what the true market demands, needs and supplies usually convey to us via prices, but ultimately the laws of the universe still apply (i.e. supply, demand and free market principles) despite what the government tries to do...

Ronald Reagan said "Government doesn't solve problems, it only subsidizes them.". In that spirit, what is the real problem?

Daniel Lyle
Wed May 6 2009 12:05
Sounds like the liberal fascists are trying to wreck yet another system they deem flawed via government monopoly rather than trust the free market. I'm not saying that bankers are saints, but government officials don't exactly wear halos either. More often than not corrupt business and govt. are in bed with each other. It's no wonder that private insurance is getting more expensive as well as private education -- you can't compete with the government monopoly on either (i.e. public education and subsidized health care programs) unless you either charge ridiculously cheap rates (and either go out of business or look unattractive) or high rates. Socialism is like a self-fulfilling prophecy - once you use mafia style tactics to force others out of business, they all come running to the new sheriff of Nottingham...It's no surprise that the Russian mafia has had such success in the former soviet union either.
If anything you young university goers, please remember to think for yourselves rather than fall for the mind tricks of the sith lords in government. Read F.A. Hayek's "The Road to Serfdom". And remember Ronald Reagan's great quote: "The government doesn't solve problems, it subsidizes them."

Danke...

Sam
Fri May 1 2009 08:01
I hear that, what about the students who have been in school for the past few years. The interest is getting higher every year and stacking up. I too will owe 2 - 3 times more than I received. I think that interest rates for college students should be low and a fixed rate, it's crap that loan companies can keep changing the interest rate. I agree that Sallie Mae truly does suck, as a student enrolled in a University outside the United States, not only am I unable to get any scholarships or grants, Sallie Mae is the only loan company that will give us loans since we do not attend University in the U,S,
ashley
Wed Apr 29 2009 09:01
I agree... all of these actions are geared towards helping future students... what about those of us who already have rediculous amounts of private loans? We need help too!!!!
brad
Mon Apr 27 2009 20:06
good - these private lenders are usurious loan sharks. not only are they fully backed by the government when a borrower defaults, but they still get to collect the debt from the borrower!

now, what can be done for borrowers like myself, who have not defaulted, but pay absurd interest rates - between 16% and 18%? my interest has repeatedly been capitalized and i now owe more than twice what i borrowed - i pay interest on interest. In fact, in the past 7 years, i've paid more than what i borrowed in the first place. $ALLIE M@E is a RACKET.

i'm not asking for a handout, just a reasonable interest rate.







log out