Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

A word on stewardship from Prof. Xtreme

IC Columnist

Published: Thursday, September 9, 2010

Updated: Thursday, September 9, 2010 17:09

In 1908, near the end of his eight-year term as President of the United States, Theodore Roosevelt resolved to dramatically change certain coinage of the United States. He commissioned a gold Indian Head Quarter Eagle, face valued at two and one-half dollars. It went into mass circulation in 1909. It was a beautiful coin. The obverse honored a Native-American in profile wearing a full-feathered war bonnet. On the reverse was a proud standing eagle; a symbol of peace, yet preparedness.

Few of these coins have survived to the present. Ironically, most were rounded up and melted down under the presidency of Franklin D. Roosevelt! There are exceptions. Here is the story of a 1909 Indian Head Quarter Eagle that outlived the purge.

A young woman named Ruby Grey from Zanesville, Ohio decides to enter college at the University of Toledo. She has an aunt there she can live with while earning her degree. Her aunt writes that Toledo is a booming city and home to many hard-working peoples from around the world. She also writes that there will be a new College of Arts and Sciences established there. She knows Ruby wants to become a teacher.

Ruby is also crazy about American history and literature. She is in fact related to P. Zane Grey, an aspiring writer, and his determination to succeed is a great inspiration to her.

So Ruby moves to Toledo in 1909 to begin her college years. She takes along two trunks filled with personal possessions. In her purse she has fifty-two dollars and fifty cents. Her father gives her fifty dollars to help her "settle in." The remainder is a tiny gift from her mother: a freshly-minted 1909 Indian Head Quarter Eagle! It is in a tiny wooden box. "For luck!" Ruby's mother says as she hands her the box.

And Ruby had good luck, indeed. She moved to Toledo, earned her degree, married the son of a banker, and taught middle school for fifty-six years. She had three children. The eldest was a boy she named Zane. When Ruby died in 1971, Zane inherited some of her possessions and one item was the small box containing the handsome gold coin now worth several hundred dollars (even though its face value remained two dollars and fifty cents.)

Ruby once told Zane that the coin in the box was a very special family treasure and some day it would be his and he must take ownership of it and care for it and give it to his own son some day. She called this responsibility "proper stewardship" and he realized that he had hardly ever heard that word used before, so he immediately looked it up in the dictionary: "One who manages another's property."

Several weeks after Ruby's funeral Zane was in his kitchen watching an NFL football game. It was halftime and he had an idea. He retrieved the small box from his bedroom dresser drawer and placed it on the kitchen table with some steel wool, powdered soap, a sponge and a bowl of water. He opened the box and removed the coin and inspected it closely. It had the patina of one hundred years passing upon its surface. He proceeded to abrade and polish the coin to an unprecedented luster, rubbing hard to ensure that the coin's value would increase substantially through his efforts. He thought he was practicing good stewardship.

The Jacobs Administration at the University of Toledo claims to be practicing good stewardship of this taxpayer-owned university. However, it has inspected the College of Arts & Sciences and has found fault with, rather than appreciation for, its unique and valuable patina earned after 100 years of excellence. There is a strong possibility that upon the implementation of the Jacobs "Directions" strategic plan beginning in November of this year, the College will be abraded and polished, perhaps beyond recognition. Is this good stewardship? Happy Anniversary, CAS!

—David Nemeth is Professor Xtreme and can be reached at david.nemeth@utoledo.edu.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

28 comments

Anonymous
Tue Sep 14 2010 21:39
Freedom of speech! I Love America! I liked Jack in 5 Pieces and Mitchum in Night of the Hunter (LOVE/HATE tattooed on his fingers). I almost forgot about Denzel Washington in Training Day, and Gordon Gekko in Wall Street. Those were iconic American performances.

I’m listening to a Spanish Song. The lead singer from Rage Against the Machine performs on a traditional South American guitar.

I’ll soon work on a song I have in mind, write the lyrics, add chords.

I love Professor Xtreme’s writing style. I love the meaning of his Stewardship as much as the last. I and my friends wish Professor Xtreme could teach us for the writing some how. We already learned a lot by reading his columns.

Thanks a lot!

By the way. Even, thousand people follow a bad direction, we should follow a good direction. Let’s think about it.

Anonymous
Mon Sep 13 2010 09:31
It's those spinners for UT News!!!!!!!! Because that wraps all my preconceptions up into a nice little package. After all, the only, only, only, only people who could disagree with Nemeth are people paid to do so. Otherwise, everything he's said is so unobjectionable and accurate, everyone would have to agree!!!!!! If you don't agree with Nemeth, all you evil posters below, then you are a spinner for UT News!!!!!!! Your opinions don't count! They're not real! Do not attack Dr. Nemeth, our messiah!!!!!!

Pathetic.

Anonymous
Sun Sep 12 2010 15:47
Oh, and "UT recruiter." I knew I forgot one there.
Anonymous
Sun Sep 12 2010 15:17
Last poster:

I will do you a few better:

"None" / "Eye roll" / "Derek" / "Derek Espinoza" / "Rx Student" / "Read a book!" and various incarnations of "Anonymous", as well as his real name when he is posting truthfully. But that hasn't happened in some time...

Anonymous
Sun Sep 12 2010 13:49
Unless you enjoy facing into a rank wind that blows mainly blather and spittle you should avoid engaging the Nonecompoop (A&S College New Faculty Handbook, Advisory # 16)
Anonymous
Sun Sep 12 2010 13:01
"Institutions that do well in the categories I listed attract strong faculty, strong students and strong researchers. Academics want to go where these things are strong and growing because it is a sign of academic health. That UT's numbers are growing show UT is on the right path."

Then why are many top scientists (with millions of dollars in external funding support) leaving UT? And why does UT continue to struggle to attract top academics if UT is such a great place to work? Look closely at the new School for Renewable Energy for examples.

"(UT's contract with faculty literally requires that faculty teach a minimum of only two (2) (!!!!!!!!!) classes a semester."

The only way any faculty member is teaching a minimum or reducted teaching load (2/2 or less) is because they are engaged in research endeavors including millions of dollars of external funding, including supporting undergrad and grad students. The vast majority of faculty at UT teach above that minimum and are required each year to make their case for less teaching in light of research work and expectations. This is the case in all UT colleges covered by that contract, not just A&S. Why not ask about the teaching and research loads of faculty in HHS, Education, Law, Business????

"I will grant you the problem of mediocre faculty is far less existent in the college of engineering, which is excellent, " On what basis do you make this statement? And how many of them are teaching more than a 2/2 load?

Anonymous
Sun Sep 12 2010 11:00
Thank you for continually demonstrating the contempt and mean spiritedness I mentioned earlier. No matter how you look at it, the atmosphere at this university has clearly become toxic and dysfunctional, and the leadership MUST accept responsibility for it, since that is what they get paid handsomely for. It has not addressed it and only continues to make it worse. Toxicity and dysfunction breed toxicity and dysfunction. Dilbert begets Dilbert. Until the leadership accepts their responsibility for it and for resolving it nothing will change. I have no reason to believe capable faculty or staff or students will choose to stay in such an atmosphere, so the victory in the war the adminstration is waging will be largely pyrrhic. Also, just like all the figures and facts the administration glories in, just like the Wall Street balance sheet of yesterday, will one day probably be shown to overstated and irrelevant regarding the true state of things.
Anonymous
Sun Sep 12 2010 10:55
It is due to this present administration’s dereliction of duty through a conspiracy to privatize this state public university that the A&S College Blog was formed by concerned faculty, students, staff and alumni. Poor stewardship of a state public higher education institution is not just a shame, it is a crime.

The Wall Street Journal on Monday, August 23rd published “The Case against Corporate Social Responsibility” wherein the author, a Professor of Strategy at the University of Michigan’s Business School, revealed the incompatibility of best practices in the “for-profit” corporate world and corporate executive’s claims to be simultaneously promoting some larger social purpose.

In other words, adopting the secular for-profit business model for strategic planning at the University of Toledo as spelled out in Jacobs’ “Directions” document and its appendices is in direct contradiction to the sacred mission of “improving the human condition.” The idea that corporations have a duty to address social ills is fundamentally flawed. The Jacobs Administration has not demonstrated or even attempted to demonstrate that it knows the difference between shame and guilt. “Whatever is legal” is their `tyrranical, arrogant and irresponsible mode of operation in their obsession to transform the university through its privatization. Count the lawyers on their staff and the dozens comprizing their propaganda machine.

Publicizing that incompatibility and its probable consequences has the constant theme of the A&S College Forum Blog (Google up "A&S College Blog") since its inception.

Blog efforts to inform the public have thus far succeeded in slowing the Jacobs Administration’s runaway train of “greed is good” but not yet derailed it. With more faculty, student, staff and alumni activism against the implementation of the “Directions” document, the mission of state public higher education can perhaps be salvaged within the next month and before it is too late.

Anonymous
Sun Sep 12 2010 10:14
I assume you mean the latter. And I find you lamenting the loss of critical thinking skills while you resort to stereotypes and cliches amusing. The "widget indexes" that you casually dismiss form the basis for how universities are perceived and thus the basis for their quality. Institutions that do well in the categories I listed attract strong faculty, strong students and strong researchers. Academics want to go where these things are strong and growing because it is a sign of academic health. That UT's numbers are growing show UT is on the right path.

It is absolutely true that the mediocre faculty and staff who have long been used to being praised for being average are no upset that they are asked to do things like teach more than two classes. (UT's contract with faculty literally requires that faculty teach a minimum of only two (2) (!!!!!!!!!) classes a semester. Then when they're asked to teach more they complain because the administration hates academic quality. No the administration wants you to get off your ass an earn your 80,000 salary for 9 months of work.

I will grant you the problem of mediocre faculty is far less existent in the college of engineering, which is excellent, but I'd rather raise the rest of the university to engineering than let all the "widget indexes" slide so that mediocre faculty are comfortable again.

Anonymous
Sun Sep 12 2010 08:28
As a matter of fact, I studied engineering. Anyway, your post is indicative of the mean-spiritedness that has enshrouded the university with the advent of this present administration. As far as your measures of success, you give the administration too much credit. Increased enrollment in this economy is no great accomplishment. Also, perhaps by the measurements they themselves define, their "widget indexes" might be going up. The question remains is this university helping to equip students with the ability to think critically and in a multidimensional fashion and in a way that can truly "improve the human condition" or, as it seems to be doing, merely reinforcing the Dilbert stereotype that much of our nation has become? I see the later happening here at Dilbert U.
Anonymous
Sat Sep 11 2010 14:43
To the plural alumni (perhaps you're an alum or an alumnus) who posted below, your blanket "UT administrators are failing" statement suggests you didn't leave UT with the critical thinking skills UT humanities professors say they teach. No doubt it was because Lloyd Jacobs came to your house and personally stole that knowledge from you.

And to the poster below, please don't forget that Dr. Nemeth's goal is to speak only to those who agree with him, so therefore anyone trying to decipher whatever the hell he was trying to say don't matter. After al, I was reminded early on by an earlier commenter to a Nemeth column that "a word to the wise is plenty". Of course, you wise people aren't in charge, don't control money, exercise no power and have forfeited your moral authority in multiple racist and sexist rants, but that's OK. I'm sure if you keep talking down to those people with power and influence and insulting minorities and people not as "wise" as you, I'm sure you'll win out in the end.
Research dollars are up. Enrollment is up. This year academic standards have been raised. Engagement with the community is up. Engagement in economic development is up. Your definition of failure - evidently based entirely on the fact that some professors are upset - is pretty intellectually lazy.

Anonymous
Sat Sep 11 2010 13:26
“A Word on Stewardship from Professor Xtreme” This story reminds me of Spain and lamancha. The lamancha is world famous for Don Quixote. Don Quixote is heroic in a novel by Spain’s author, Cervantes. The lamancha is also a title of a movie. Sophia Loren is in it.

There is a gigantic beautiful castle standing up there in lamancha after all those times until now (even in wind and storm). Listen to Don Quixote’s howling around the castle like a madman all night long and very often. A ghost its told.

The Spain story has caught attention to tourists. There’s a path through all the way in front of that castle (and side by the castle). This is the romantic place I never seen, so quiet and solitary, for honeymooners or lovers or old people. They are walking around the castle or passing through it hand in hand, or alone and by themself.

UT’s beautiful tower reminds me of lamancha with its castle exactly, majestic standing there and guiding people quietly. There is a right direction. To see UT’s, I’ll share it. The good life is honest, humble and sincere. No lies belong. Students, faculties, staffs, alumnies, etc, need honesty right now. I pity this administration and this BOT and some of prefessors who works for them.

One Anonymous says about the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, but he or she missed the whole point of professor Xtreme’s story. We can not argue with readers ignorance. Just ignore for it. Probably, not only he or she but also Jacobs and his administrators and BOT don’t understand about it (stewardship). We must help them understand.

Well Professor Xtreme and IC Editors, you did a marvelous job! That 1909 eagle coins, front and back, what a clever!

Anonymous
Fri Sep 10 2010 22:53
As an alumni who has remained close to UT, I would have to say very seriously that this administration has and will continue to fail. Their contempt for faculty, institutional history here at UT is very obvious to all. They have not, as in Jacob's own words, just thrown one dean "under the bus" but all academia. Mark my words, in a few short years, after all of these so called administrators have long retired with their golden parachutes, we will be picking up the pieces for decades to come.
Anonymous
Fri Sep 10 2010 17:20
Anonymous posting at Fri Sep 10 2010 16:00:

The problem with Nemeth's post obviously was not simply linguistic. Rather it was in Nemeth's sweeping assumption about "urban" students - that they are academically unfit for UT - which prompted many of us in the UT community to criticize him. In making his assertion, he was positing a shared link among the students leading to their poor academic skiils. And, as near as I can tell, the two common demoninators are race and class (that is, middle-class or poor). So, if it wasn't racially motivated, it seems like it was elitist.

One might say the comments were not accompanied by a negative judgment by Nemeth of the "urban" students but rather by the school system or government policies that lead to underfunded inner-city school systems; but, of course, this was not the case. In his response to a faculty member's letter, at such time when an apology would have been much more appropriate, he blamed the "urban" students by saying "public primary and secondary schools as 'trashed' by student 'discipline problems and anti-academic attitudes'."

To the last poster:

Thank you for injecting some sense into this debate (and perhaps others on the IC site). Certain posters see fit to post ridiculous claims without any support or context unless they are prodded by others to do so. And even then, it takes a few times and the defense is not beyond reproach... But at least they provide SOME measure of evidence, unlike the above columnist.

Anonymous
Fri Sep 10 2010 16:04
Ohio taxpayers are not paying for faculty 3 month summer vacations since faculty are not paid over the summer.

If you are hired by a company to work Mon to Fri, 9 to 5 on a set hourly salary, are you willing to work evenings and weekends for no pay? Sure you may agree to, or put in extra work or overtime (paid or not paid), but would you work those extra hours for no pay? In fact many summer are here on campus working over the summer for no pay.

But why should faculty who are not paid for the summer be expected to work for the University and State for those months? Would you be willing to?

Anonymous
Fri Sep 10 2010 16:00
So when the US Department of Education refers to urban schools, and the challenges of urban schools (which that Department has been commenting on for decades) are they also "racist"? Are all the accepted studies on urban schools also racist? When the University discusses recruiting from urban school and comments on HS GPA from urban schools is that also racist?
Anonymous
Fri Sep 10 2010 09:34
If we were truly being stewards of the future, we'd sweep 3/4 of the faculty out of this college who are working so hard to hang on to hang on to the past and teach in a way irrelevant to students' needs in the future.

What is really meant is Ohio taxpayers need to remain stewards for faculty's 3 month long summer vacations, 30 hour days, life-time guaranteed jobs and retirement payments. Is there anything else you need Dr. Nemeth? A hot tub in your office perhaps so you don't get uncomfortable?

Anonymous
Fri Sep 10 2010 09:25
I have seen, what I assume, is the same writer calling for other Arts & Sciences faculty to comment when their colleagues say something offensive. I think it is important to note that regarding the "urban" issue, Dr. Ashley Pryor was quick to question Dr. Nemeth's offensive words and speak out. Perhaps more faculty should, but the notion that hate like Dr. Nemeth's goes unchallenged is not true.
Anonymous
Fri Sep 10 2010 09:17
I'm happy for Dr. Nemeth. On Dec. 4 on the Arts and Sciences Council blog Dr. Nemeth talked about how awful it was that "urban" students were flooding UT and destroying the college. However, this year, the number of freshman is down (wait, is all enrollment down 9.5 percent or just freshman enrollment?) and therefore the numbers of those "urban" students must be down too. No longer does Dr. Nemeth have to stand at the front of a classroom with "urban" students who by their inherent nature are destroying UT.

Unfortunately, the number of women at UT is still higher than the number of men. On July 13, Dr. Nemeth (posting in his supersecret code name Diogenes) referred to women at UT as "hens", dubbing UT a "Heniversity". It was very clever and served the dual purpose of reminding UT what Dr. Nemeth things about women.

Can't we just go back to the days where only whi, er, I mean "suburban" males were the only ones in our classrooms? Dr. Nemeth and I remember the good old days, though as I've pointed out, he writes about them more often than I.

It's not a popular position nowadays, but it's a provocative one, so therefore it must be good.

Anonymous
Thu Sep 9 2010 18:40
Wow! I had no idea Professor X-treme was gay! I'm pretty sure now that he's the "poet" and Jake is the "scientist."






log out